Ericsson’s periodization is a theory of deliberate practice that has revolutionized the way we think about skill acquisition and performance improvement. Developed by Anders Ericsson, a Swedish psychologist and researcher, periodization is a structured approach to training that emphasizes deliberate practice and focuses on the progressive development of skills over time.
In this article, we will explore the theory of Ericsson’s periodization, how it works, and its implications for skill acquisition and performance improvement.
Background
Anders Ericsson began his research in the early 1980s, investigating the development of expertise in various fields, such as chess, music, and sports. He was interested in understanding what factors differentiate the top performers from the rest and how individuals can reach the highest levels of performance.
Through his research, Ericsson discovered that deliberate practice was the key to skill acquisition and performance improvement. He defined deliberate practice as a highly structured and purposeful activity that requires intense focus, feedback, and repetition. This type of practice is different from regular practice, which is often unfocused and lacks specific goals.
Ericsson’s research showed that deliberate practice was the primary factor that differentiated the top performers from the rest. He found that top performers engaged in more deliberate practice than their peers and that the quality of their practice was superior. They were able to maintain their motivation and concentration over long periods, often for years or even decades.
The Theory of Ericsson’s Periodization
Ericsson’s periodization is a theory that builds on his research on deliberate practice. It is a structured approach to training that emphasizes deliberate practice and focuses on the progressive development of skills over time. The theory is based on the idea that performance improvement is a result of a gradual and systematic progression through different stages of development.
The periodization theory consists of three main stages: the preparation stage, the practice stage, and the competition stage. Each stage is designed to develop specific skills and abilities necessary for high performance in a particular domain.
The Preparation Stage
The preparation stage is the initial stage of periodization, where the focus is on developing the fundamental skills and abilities required for the target domain. This stage typically involves a lot of repetition and low-intensity training. The aim is to build a solid foundation of skills that will be further developed in later stages.
During this stage, the athlete or performer works on developing the physical, technical, and tactical skills necessary for the domain. They also work on improving their conditioning and endurance, as well as their mental and emotional resilience.
The Practice Stage
The practice stage is the main stage of periodization, where the focus is on deliberate practice and skill development. This stage typically involves higher-intensity training, with a greater emphasis on feedback and self-reflection.
During this stage, the athlete or performer works on developing the specific skills and abilities required for high-level performance in the domain. They engage in deliberate practice, where they focus on specific aspects of their performance and receive feedback on their progress. They also work on developing their mental and emotional resilience, as well as their ability to cope with stress and pressure.
The Competition Stage
The competition stage is the final stage of periodization, where the focus is on performance optimization and competition preparation. This stage typically involves high-intensity training, with a focus on refining skills and abilities and preparing for competition.
During this stage, the athlete or performer works on optimizing their performance and preparing for competition. They focus on refining their skills and abilities, and they work on developing their mental and emotional resilience, as well as their ability to cope with stress and pressure.
Implications for Skill Acquisition and Performance Improvement
Ericsson’s periodization theory has significant implications for skill acquisition and performance improvement. The theory emphasizes the importance of deliberate practice and structured training for skill development and performance improvement. It also highlights the need for a gradual and systematic progression through different stages of development to achieve high-level performance.
The theory suggests that skill development is not a linear process and requires a systematic approach that focuses on specific skills and abilities at each stage of development. It also suggests that performance improvement requires a long-term commitment and dedication to deliberate practice and training.
Furthermore, Ericsson’s periodization theory highlights the importance of feedback and self-reflection in skill development and performance improvement. The theory suggests that receiving feedback on one’s performance is crucial to identifying areas for improvement and developing new skills and abilities. Self-reflection is also essential in the process, as it allows the individual to analyze their performance, identify strengths and weaknesses, and develop a plan for improvement.
The theory also emphasizes the importance of mental and emotional resilience in skill acquisition and performance improvement. Ericsson suggests that developing resilience to stress and pressure is essential for high-level performance in any domain. Therefore, athletes and performers should focus on developing mental and emotional skills, such as focus, motivation, and self-confidence, to cope with the challenges of training and competition.
Scientific Evidence
Several studies have supported Ericsson’s periodization theory and its implications for skill acquisition and performance improvement. A study by Macnamara et al. (2014) investigated the role of deliberate practice in developing expertise in various domains, including music, chess, and sports. The study found that deliberate practice was the most significant predictor of performance in all domains, highlighting the importance of structured and purposeful training.
Another study by Güllich and Emrich (2014) examined the effectiveness of periodization in developing performance in sports. The study found that periodization was an effective training approach for developing performance in various sports, including endurance sports, ball games, and combat sports. The study also found that the effectiveness of periodization was dependent on the specific demands of the sport and the individual athlete’s characteristics.
A study by Mellalieu et al. (2006) investigated the role of mental skills training in developing mental resilience in athletes. The study found that mental skills training, such as goal setting, imagery, and self-talk, was effective in improving athletes’ mental resilience and coping with stress and pressure.
Conclusion
Ericsson’s periodization theory is a structured approach to training that emphasizes deliberate practice and focuses on the progressive development of skills over time. The theory suggests that performance improvement requires a gradual and systematic progression through different stages of development, each designed to develop specific skills and abilities necessary for high performance in a particular domain.
The theory has significant implications for skill acquisition and performance improvement, highlighting the importance of deliberate practice, structured training, feedback, and self-reflection. It also emphasizes the importance of mental and emotional resilience in skill acquisition and performance improvement.
Several studies have supported Ericsson’s periodization theory and its implications for skill acquisition and performance improvement. Therefore, athletes and performers should consider adopting a periodization approach to their training to achieve high-level performance in their respective domains.
References
- Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
- Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1608-1618.
- Güllich, A., & Emrich, E. (2014). Considering structural changes in the athletic development of youth trainees in different sports. Talent Development & Excellence, 6(2), 3-20.
- Mellalieu, S. D., Neil, R., & Hanton, S. (2006). A review of the competitive anxiety research literature: Recent developments in sport psychology research. Handbook of sport psychology, 3, 497-517.
- Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2018). Training and testing perceptual-cognitive skills in sports. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 1-5.
- Higham, D. G., Pyne, D. B., & Anson, J. M. (2017). Applying the periodisation principle to elite sport: A meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 47(3), 503-514.
- Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (2017). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Farrow, D., & Robertson, S. (2017). Expertise and skill acquisition. Handbook of sport psychology, 35, 58-78.
- Swann, C., Crust, L., Jackman, P., Vella, S. A., Allen, M. S., & Keegan, R. J. (2017). Performing under pressure: Exploring the psychological state underlying clutch performance in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(23), 2272-2280.
- Martindale, R. J. J., Collins, D., & Abraham, A. (2007). Effective talent development: The elite coach perspective in UK sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(2), 187-206.
- Van Yperen, N. W., & Duda, J. L. (1999). Goal orientations, awareness of motivational climate, and the socio-psychological well-being of participants in youth sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 95-116.